0

Will open-source chips democratize the industry?

In the early 1990s, a Finnish student named Linus Torvalds released a free operating system kernel called Linux. This new operating system, together with projects like Apache, proved that collaborative, open-source development could produce software that competes with and surpasses propriety alternatives. These days, Linux runs on everything from smartphones to supercomputers, and open-source software forms the backbone of modern internet infrastructure. But what about hardware — could it be due for a similar transformation.

At the center of the open-source hardware movement sits RISC-V, an open instruction set architecture that provides a foundation for custom chip design without the licensing fees that have defined the semiconductor industry for decades. With artificial intelligence reshaping computing demands and driving need for specialized processors optimized for machine learning workloads, RISC-V offers a path for companies and researchers to build AI-specific chips without starting from scratch or cutting royalty checks to incumbent architecture owners. The potential implications are hard to ignore — lower barriers to entry for hardware startups, reduced dependency on any single vendor’s ecosystem, and the possibility of community-driven innovation happening at the silicon level.

What is RISC-V?

RISC-V (pronounced “risk-five”) is a free and open standard instruction set architecture built on reduced instruction set computer principles. An instruction set architecture defines the interface between software and hardware — essentially, the vocabulary that processors understand. Unlike proprietary ISAs such as Intel’s x86 or ARM’s architecture, RISC-V specifications ship under permissive open-source licenses, which means anyone can implement them without paying royalties.

The architecture traces its origins to the University of California, Berkeley, and is now managed by RISC-V International, a Swiss-based standards development organization. This governance structure keeps the standard neutral and accessible, ensuring no single company can control its direction. The distinction from proprietary models is that companies wanting to build processors using x86 or ARM architectures have to negotiate licensing agreements and pay fees that can stretch into tens of millions of dollars. RISC-V eliminates this barrier entirely.

What makes RISC-V particularly well-suited for AI applications is its modular framework. The base instruction set is deliberately minimalistic, providing essential computing operations while allowing designers to bolt on custom extensions for specialized tasks. This extensibility is valuable for AI accelerator development, where workloads benefit from domain-specific optimizations. Chip designers can implement vector processing extensions for neural network operations, create custom instructions for matrix multiplication, or optimize for specific power and performance trade-offs, all while maintaining compatibility with the broader RISC-V ecosystem.

Advantages of Open-Source Silicon

Eliminating licensing fees is the most immediate benefit of open-source chip design. For startups trying to break into the semiconductor space, avoiding upfront ISA licensing costs can be the difference between a viable business model and an impossible one. Established companies benefit too, escaping vendor lock-in rather than depending on a single architecture provider’s roadmap and pricing decisions. This cost advantage compounds over time as organizations keep more resources for actual engineering and manufacturing instead of licensing overhead.

Customization capabilities go well beyond cost savings. With full access to the instruction set specification, developers can optimize processors for specific AI workloads rather than accepting general-purpose designs. Edge AI applications might prioritize power efficiency over raw performance, while data center accelerators might emphasize throughput and memory bandwidth. RISC-V allows these trade-offs to happen at the architecture level, enabling chips tailored to particular use cases rather than one-size-fits-all solutions.

The architecture’s flexibility also supports heterogeneous computing. Modern AI workloads often demand different types of processing — general-purpose computation for data preprocessing, specialized acceleration for neural network inference, and lightweight control logic for system management. RISC-V provides a standardized foundation spanning these requirements, from simple microcontrollers to high-performance vector processors. A unified platform enables software compatibility across diverse core types while still allowing hardware specialization where it counts.

Community-driven innovation accelerates development in ways proprietary ecosystems simply can’t match. A growing number of developers and organizations contribute to RISC-V tools, libraries, and reference implementations. This collaborative model pools resources that would otherwise be duplicated across competing closed platforms. The result is faster advancement in compilers, debugging tools, and software stacks.

Constraints

While RISC-V eliminates licensing fees, it doesn’t eliminate the fundamental costs and complexities of semiconductor development. Designing a competitive processor requires substantial engineering expertise and resources regardless of the underlying instruction set. Fabricating chips at advanced process nodes, something that’s necessary for high-performance AI applications, involves manufacturing costs that can reach hundreds of millions of dollars for a single tape-out. The open-source ISA addresses only one piece of a much larger cost structure.

Open designs also have to compete with proprietary solutions that have benefited from billions of dollars in sustained investment. Nvidia’s GPU ecosystem, for example, combines highly optimized hardware with mature software frameworks like CUDA that have been refined over more than a decade. These closed platforms benefit from tight feedback loops between hardware and software teams, specialized manufacturing partnerships, and integrated toolchains that fragmented open-source efforts can’t easily replicate. Performance gaps may narrow over time, but proprietary accelerators currently hold significant advantages for many mainstream AI workloads.

Software ecosystem maturity remains a critical constraint. Even the most innovative hardware is only as useful as the software running on it. Proprietary platforms offer comprehensive toolchains — compilers that extract maximum performance, debuggers that streamline development, drivers ensuring compatibility across operating systems. The RISC-V ecosystem is developing these tools, but achieving parity requires sustained effort from a community that, while growing, remains smaller than the teams supporting established architectures.

Manufacturing access presents a structural challenge that no ISA choice can solve. Advanced semiconductor fabrication is concentrated among a handful of global foundries, primarily TSMC, Samsung, and Intel. This concentration creates geopolitical supply chain risks and capacity constraints affecting open and proprietary designs alike. Organizations choosing RISC-V still depend on the same manufacturing infrastructure as those using ARM or x86. Open-source hardware doesn’t provide insulation from the industry’s most fundamental bottleneck.

Plenty of use-cases

Governments are increasingly viewing open hardware as a strategic asset for technological sovereignty. Nations dependent on foreign semiconductor technology face supply chain vulnerabilities that recent chip shortages and trade restrictions have laid bare. By supporting RISC-V development and domestic chip design capabilities, governments can reduce reliance on foreign ISA providers while building their own expertise. This motivation is driving policy initiatives in both Western countries concerned about supply chain dependencies and nations seeking greater technological independence from established semiconductor powers.

The security advantages of open designs come down to transparency. Proprietary processors are essentially black boxes — users have to trust that manufacturers haven’t introduced vulnerabilities, whether intentional backdoors or unintentional flaws. Open-source hardware allows organizations to audit designs, verify implementations, and build confidence that chips perform only their intended functions. This “security through transparency” appeals to governments, defense contractors, and enterprises handling sensitive data—all of whom have reason to distrust hardware they can’t inspect.

Some companies are open-sourcing portions of their hardware designs specifically to build trust with clients and regulators. In markets where security concerns influence purchasing decisions, demonstrable openness becomes a competitive advantage. Customers can verify claims about chip functionality rather than accepting vendor assurances on faith. This approach trades potential competitive disadvantages of revealing design details against the market access that transparency enables.

For companies currently licensing architectures from Intel or ARM, RISC-V presents a cost-benefit calculation worth examining. The licensing savings are tangible, particularly for organizations with specialized requirements that proprietary designs don’t address efficiently. However, switching costs are real—existing software investments, engineering familiarity, and ecosystem dependencies all create friction. The calculus differs by organization: well-resourced companies with unique requirements may find RISC-V compelling, while those satisfied with off-the-shelf solutions may see insufficient reason to change.

Key players

SiFive has emerged as a pioneer in commercializing RISC-V processor designs. Founded by inventors of the RISC-V architecture, the company offers configurable processor cores that customers can license and customize for their applications. SiFive’s business model demonstrates that open-source hardware can support commercial enterprises—the company monetizes design services and support rather than ISA licensing. Their processors have found applications across automotive, consumer electronics, and increasingly, AI edge devices.

Akeana focuses specifically on high-performance RISC-V cores optimized for AI workloads. The company develops complete system intellectual property, including not just processor cores but also memory optimization, integrated software stacks, and the supporting infrastructure that AI accelerators require. This full-stack approach addresses one of RISC-V’s challenges: customers need more than an instruction set to build competitive chips. By providing comprehensive solutions, Akeana aims to lower the barrier for organizations looking to develop AI silicon.

XiangShan represents a different model entirely: a fully open-source project demonstrating agile development methodologies for high-performance processors. Developed primarily in China, XiangShan provides reference implementations that others can study, modify, and improve. The project showcases how academic and research institutions can contribute to the ecosystem, pushing performance boundaries while making results publicly available.

Major technology firms have adopted RISC-V too, typically for specific low-power or embedded components rather than flagship products. Western Digital uses RISC-V cores in its storage controllers, while Nvidia — despite its proprietary GPU business — employs RISC-V for certain management processors. Chinese technology companies have shown particular interest given geopolitical pressures around semiconductor access. These adoptions validate RISC-V’s viability without yet threatening proprietary architectures’ dominance in high-performance computing.

Conclusions

The conditions required for open-source hardware to achieve mainstream disruption are demanding but not impossible. Software ecosystem maturity stands as perhaps the most critical factor — RISC-V implementations will struggle to gain widespread adoption until developers can rely on toolchains, libraries, and debugging capabilities matching proprietary alternatives. Progress is visible but incomplete, and closing this gap requires sustained investment from both commercial and community contributors. Manufacturing access presents a longer-term challenge. Until advanced fabrication becomes more distributed or accessible, open designs will face the same production constraints as closed ones.

Risks that could keep the movement in niche territory are equally apparent. Ecosystem fragmentation poses a genuine threat — if multiple incompatible RISC-V implementations proliferate, the advantages of standardization diminish. Incumbent dominance in AI accelerators, particularly Nvidia’s comprehensive GPU ecosystem, may prove difficult to overcome through cost advantages alone when performance and software maturity matter more. The structural complexity of hardware development also creates barriers that software never faced.

Whether open-source hardware becomes a primary standard or remains a specialized alternative will likely depend on specific market segments rather than a universal outcome. Edge AI and IoT applications, where cost sensitivity runs high and performance requirements are modest, seem most ripe for RISC-V adoption. Data center AI, dominated by organizations that can afford premium proprietary solutions, may prove more resistant. The open-source ethos can meaningfully impact AI semiconductors, but the transformation, if it comes, will likely be slower and more selective than the software revolution that inspired it.